USPTO serial 75397568
MICRO ASSAY PLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICRO ASSAY PLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
72622 Nurtingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUCY P NICHOLS
LUCY P NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROPLATES WITH OR WITHOUT MEMBRANE, TUBES AND PLATES FOR LABORATORY USE, NAMELY, TEST TUBES AND SAMPLE TUBES, FLAT-BOTTLE LABORATORY VESSELS,CULTURE DISHES, IN PARTICULAR TISSUE CULTURE FLASKS, PETRIDISHES, ROLLER BOTTLES, REACTION VESSELS, SAMPLE BEAKERS, DISPOSABLE VESSELS FOR MASS CELL CULTURE, PLATES FOR CARRYING OUT HAEMAGGLUTINATION TESTS, PLASTIC BOTTLES, RACKS FOR MICROPLATES, FILLING APPARATUSES FOR MICROPLATESF, ALL MADE OF PLASTIC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |