USPTO serial 75398098
SHOE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN MANCINELLI
STEVEN MANCINELLI CODISPOTI & MANCINELLI LLP350 BROADWAY 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the products of wholesalers and manufacturers in the shoe industry via an on-line database website on a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 1997 |
| 042 | Computer Services, namely, providing on-line website on global computer networks for conducting real-time merchandising transactions between wholesalers/manufactures and retailers in the shoe industry, and providing an on-line database in the filed of shoe merchandising | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |