Drawing for WE PUT THE KNOWLEDGE IN TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75398290

WE PUT THE KNOWLEDGE IN TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2520467Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2001
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with WE PUT THE KNOWLEDGE IN TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK K RAFFERTY

PATRICK K RAFFERTY ADAMS & RAFFERTYP O BOX 5515SANTA ROSA, CA 95402-5515UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in tracking and responding to customer complaints; computer software containing information in the field of dispute resolution, and for tracking and managing disputes with customers and suppliers; computer software for use by technical support help desk personnel to identify callers and assign calls to appropriate personnelSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2008C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 3, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 18, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 17, 2001CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 13, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance