USPTO serial 75398292
PIRANHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIRANHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie S. Spitalney
LESLIE S SPITALNEY HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for research, retrieval, delivery, analysis and/or display of financial, corporate, company and/or securities information, documents, real-time data, and/or databases for the purpose of evaluating and/or comparing financial information regarding public and private companies and individuals to perform universal searching across the data, peer analyses, regression analyses, time series analyses, competitive analyses, side-by-side comparisons of "as-reported" with standardized financial data, create research reports and recommendation letters, and set-up broadcast alerts | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 1997 |
| 036 | Computerized on-line services, namely, providing research, analysis and information services for others via global computer networks assessing financial information and real-time data regarding private companies and individuals, and delivery of such information by electronic means | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |