USPTO serial 75398507
SMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MONICA B. RICHMAN
MONICA B RICHMAN BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER & STEINER120 W 45TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Technical assistance in the establishment and operation of wholesale distributorships primarily in the fields of giftware; novelties; collectibles, housewares, dolls, toys, games, and sporting goods; clothing and accessories; jewelry and horological instruments; notions; publications; stationery; business supplies; business and carrying cases; leather and imitation leather products; electronic; photographic and optical goods; tools; tools; cosmetics; fragrances, personal care items; musical instruments and musical sculptures; and fabrics and artificial plants | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 1967 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |