Drawing for FRACTAL

USPTO serial 75398730

FRACTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRACTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SEAN HENEGHAN

SEAN HENEGHAN FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MAGNETICALLY ENCODED PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS, MAGNETICALLY ENCODED DEBIT CARDS, TELEPHONES, TELEPHONE HAND SETS, PAGERS, FACSIMILE MACHINES, MODEMS, COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ENABLING TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR ENABLING TELECOMMUNICATION OF DATA; DATA ROUTERS AND SWITCHESACTIVE
038PROVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ISDN, FRAME RELAY, ATM SERVICES AND PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance