USPTO serial 75398887
REAL FRUITCHIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2458701Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2001
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REAL FRUITCHIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abbotsford, B.C., CA
Abbotsford, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lois B. Duquette
Lois B. Duquette The Hershey Company100 Crystal A DriveLaw Dept.Hershey, PA 17033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRUIT BASED GEL IN PARTICULATE FORM THAT RETAINS ESSENTIAL FLAVOR PROPERTIES OF ITS ORIGINAL FRUIT BASE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 12, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |