USPTO serial 75398890
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FEATHERBED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCKY MOUNTAIN FEATHERBED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-824 13 Hudiksvall, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SE2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Sports, casual and leisurewear, namely, ski suits, jackets, trousers, sweaters, shirts, gloves, caps and underwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |