USPTO serial 75398959
ESPRESSOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESPRESSOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK V. JORDAN
MARK V JORDAN INVICTA LAW GROUP PLLC1000 SECOND AVE STE 3310SEATTLE, WA 98104-1046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Potting soil | ACTIVE | May 16, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |