USPTO serial 75398990
TOTALUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTALUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Thornhill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D ST LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC GAMBLING GAME MACHINES FOR CASINOS AND FOR PLAYING GAMES OF CHANCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |