USPTO serial 75399050
PINOSOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINOSOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
920 27 Hlohovec, SK
920 27 Hlohovec, SK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH W KALISH JR
RALPH W KALISH JR PEPER MARTIN JENSEN MAICHEL AND HETLAGE720 OLIVE ST 24TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101-2396UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals and chemical substances for manufacturing pharmaceuticals, chemicals and chemical substances used in the field of pharmaceutical science for scienfific or research use; chemical food preservatives for use in food processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely, an indication group of otorhinolaringological drugs (ENT drugs), for the treatment of a cold, acute and chronic rhinitis and nasopharyngitis which are not complicated with secondary bacterial infection; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammations of trachea and bronchi particularly those caused by catching a cold; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of infection caused by surgery of nasal cavity or nasal tamponage; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, nasal drops, nasal cream, nasal unguent, and solid drug forms for the treatment of chronic atrophic rhinitis, chronic hypertrophic rhinitis and breathing difficulties; food for medically restricted diets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |