USPTO serial 75399290
GLOBALPULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBALPULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Workingham, Berkshire, RG41 5TS, GB
BERKSHIRE RG41 5TS, GB
BERKSHIRE RG41 5TS, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT C FABER
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-0403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for connecting a mobile phone to a computer and usable for various applications namely, e-mail, facsimile, message service, access to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TDK Grey Cell Limited
- Other trademarks owned by TDK SYSTEMS EUROPE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by TDK SYSTEMS EUROPE LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GLOBALPULSE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |