USPTO serial 75399443
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AARON B RETZER
AARON B RETZER EPSTEIN EDELL & RETZER1901 RESEARCH BLVD STE 400ROCKVILLE, MD 20850UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Carrying cases for electronic equipment and computers, and security and monitoring systems for carrying cases for electronic equipment and computers, namely, cable locks, motion sensing alarms, combination locks, and notebook computer carrying cases with integral remote control security locks and alarms | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |