Drawing for MEDIA CHECK

USPTO serial 75399449

MEDIA CHECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, STACEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIA CHECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS LANGER

THOMAS LANGER COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANESTE 1210551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Detection devices, namely, computer hardware and software to code signals for use in audience research to monitor exposure to all forms of broadcast, playback and print media; computer hardware and software for use in identifying songs broadcast over the airACTIVE—
035Market research, namely, audience research for monitoring exposure to all forms of broadcast, playback and print mediaACTIVE—
042Design, development and testing of computer hardware and software that monitors audience exposure to all forms of broadcast, playback and print media, and for identifying songs broadcast to an audienceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 24, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Apr 19, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 18, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 17, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance