USPTO serial 75399488
BELIEVE IN TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BELIEVE IN TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN ZIFF-DAVIS INC1 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Television programming; production of television programs; education and entertainment in the nature of ongoing television series and programs in the fields of technology, computers, computing, computer hardware, computer software, computer technology, computer networks and networking, information technology, communications, telecommunications, communications technology, high technology, interactive and online services, entertainment, computer and video games, finance, news and a wide range of general interest information; educational services, namely, conducting conferences and seminars in the fields of technology, computers, computing, computer hardware, computer software, computer technology, computer networks and networking, information technology, communications, telecommunications, communications technology, high technology, interactive and online services; educational services, namely, providing training by means of classroom and online courses, seminars and interactive classes in the use and programming of computers and computer software applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |