USPTO serial 75399544
IMPERIAL GALLERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMPERIAL GALLERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F MICHAEL SAJOVEC
F MICHAEL SAJOVEC MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVECP O BOX 37428RALEIGH, NC 27627UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIAL HOME DECOR GROUP (US) LLC, THE
- Other trademarks owned by Imperial Wallcoverings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIAL HOME DECOR GROUP (US) LLC, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named IMPERIAL GALLERY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |