Drawing for AQUAFLOW

USPTO serial 75399681

AQUAFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUAFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER C. LANDO

PETER C LANDO WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PCFEDERAL RESERVE PLZ600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011POLLUTION CONTROL, PROCESS WATER, RAW WATER, EFFLUENT WATER AND WASTE WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR USE IN THE PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY, NAMELY, CLARIFIERS, ACTIVATED SLUDGE AERATION DIFFUSERS, SLUDGE DEWATERING PRESSES, WATER PURIFICATION AND TREATMENT PUMPS, VALVES, PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS, MICROFILTERS, ULTRAFILTERS, AND NANOFILTERSACTIVE
037CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROL AND PROCESS WATER, RAW WATER AND WASTE WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT IN THE PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRYACTIVE
040ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING PROCESS WATER, EFFLUENT AND/OR WASTE WATER TREATMENT SERVICES FOR THE PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRYACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 8, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 6, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 30, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 10, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 30, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 1, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 1, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 1, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 4, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance