USPTO serial 75400041
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NED W.BRANTHOVER
NED W BRANTHOVER ROBIN, BLECKER & DALEY330 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic machines and instruments, namely, integrated circuits, cathode ray tubes; computers including central processing units and peripheral equipment for computers; CD-ROM drivers; CD-ROM cases; electron tubes; semi-conductor elements and devices; electronic circuits for video games excluding those carrying computer programs; programmed-data-carrying electronic circuits for video games; programmed-data-carrying electronic magnetic discs for video games; programmed-data-carrying electronic magnetic tapes for video games; programmed-data-carrying electronic CD-ROMS for video games; game equipment containing memory devices, namely, electronic magnetic discs; CD-ROM recorded virtual reality game software; CD-ROM encoded video game software; CD-ROM encoded computer game software; memory cartridges for personal computer game; joysticks for personal computer game; video game machine for use with televisions for personal use, video game machines for use with televisions for commercial use; analog controllers for video game; video game discs; memory cartridges for video game; joysticks for video game; compact disc players, memory cards for video game; electrically erasable programmable read only memory cards; loudspeakers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |