USPTO serial 75400107
CANADIAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANADIAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN M SEAGER
GLENN M SEAGER CROMPTON, SEAGER & TUFTE LLCSTE 8001221 NICOLLET AVEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403-2420Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Rough diamonds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ABER DIAMOND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Aber Resources Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ABER DIAMOND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named CANADIAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |