Drawing for LIGHTERLOGG

USPTO serial 75400141

LIGHTERLOGG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHTERLOGG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY L WAMER

GARY L WAMER FIRST BRANDS CORPP O BOX 1911DANBURY, CT 06813-1911UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Combustible preformed mixture of wax and sawdust used to ignite natural wood, charcoal, and other combustible materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 13, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 13, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance