USPTO serial 75400214
µFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with µFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL M. STEINS
KARL M STEINS STEINS & ASSOCIATES2333 CAMINO DEL RIO S STE 120SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-3607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automated production machines for assembling and processing microchips, flip chips, and other chip scale package devices utilizing the enabling technology of flexible circuit film tape; Machines that cut flexible circuit film tape, and/or attach the cut segment to a carrier assembly, and/or laminate coverlay tape, and/or apply, dispense, assemble or process various semiconductor chip scale package components to the flexible circuit film tape | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |