USPTO serial 75400434
KINGS' CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2941018Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KINGS' CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
SG
Other trademarks owned by Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
SG
Other trademarks owned by Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
SG
Other trademarks owned by Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FREDERICK W. MEYERS
FREDERICK W MEYERS LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cooking oil, namely, vegetable oil, sun flower oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Rice, tapioca, sago, salt, dark and light soy sauces, mushroom sauce, baking powder; biscuits, tea, cocoa, sugar, processed cereals, processed grains, rice flour, glutinous rice flour, wheat flour, candy, honey, vermicelli; chrysanthemum tea drinks, green tea drinks, herbal tea drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Chia Khim Lee Food Industries Pte Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KINGS' CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |