USPTO serial 75400695
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Columbia, SC
Columbia, SC
Trilogy Development Group, Inc.
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Gushow
RICHARD J GROOS FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING A WEB SITE FEATURING ONLINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING AUTOMOBILES AND OTHER MOTOR VEHICLES, AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, AND DISSEMINATION OF PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |