USPTO serial 75400726
SMARTCODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTCODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
34940 Montpellier Cedex 9, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason D Firth
MARY KATHRYN LEE CHIEF TRADEMARK PARALEGALSTEINHART & FALCONER LLP333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2133Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | application software for computer mobile platforms, namely, software for providing access to and communications between and among global and local computer communications networks; and software for sending and receiving faxes, voice mail and electronic mail via a handheld computer | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |