Drawing for THE LOUISVILLE LIP

USPTO serial 75400927

THE LOUISVILLE LIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KULICK, LIZBETH B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LOUISVILLE LIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN E. SHAPIRO, ESQ

STEVEN E SHAPIRO ESQ MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1625UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028games and playthings, namely, action figures and accessories therefor; bendable toy figurines; plush toys; stuffed toys; puppets; inflatable vinyl toy figures; dolls, doll clothing and accessories therefor; paper dolls, printed paper doll clothing and accessories therefor; toy plastic dishes; costume masks; toy jewelry; hand-held unit for playing electronic games; coin-operated pinball machines; toy model hobbycraft kits; equipment sold as units for purposes of playing board, parlor and skill and action-type games; boxed jigsaw puzzles; jigsaw puzzles sold as units in their assembled form; hand-held manipulative puzzles; card games; self-erasing toy writing and drawing board device intended for temporarily receiving written and/or drawn impressions; marbles; yo-yo's; toy gliders and toy guns which project said gliders; sewing/lacing play activity cards; toy banks; toy building blocks; bath tub toys; kites; flying disks; balloons; ride-on toys; toy tricycles and bicycles; toy vehicles; skateboards; rollerskates; cases for play accessoriesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 20, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 5, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 1, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 28, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 3, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 5, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 3, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 23, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance