USPTO serial 75401080
OMNIPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2769390Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2003
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OMNIPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael K. Barron
Michelle A. Massicotte, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP100 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software used to conduct financial transactions; namely, a system combining computer software, printers and electronic data terminals which accept smart cards, credit cards, debit cards and other authorization devices used for processing, authorizing and transferring credit and debit card transactions, payments, account balances, financial data and other transaction information presented thereto, and used for on-line services, data communications systems, home shopping, transaction processing systems, point-of-sale or service systems, and financial transactions information and approval systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |