Drawing for PRINCESS SLEEPYHEAD

USPTO serial 75401625

PRINCESS SLEEPYHEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRINCESS SLEEPYHEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT GARBUS KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028stuffed toys, dolls, toy actions figures and accessories therefor,toy weapons, action skill games, board games, hand held units for playing electronic games, flying discs, kites, pool floats for recreational use, inflatable toy figures, jigsaw puzzles, and balloonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 31, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 15, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance