USPTO serial 75401817
VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail Store Services Featuring wine, wine accessories and wine related materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment exhibitions in the nature of conducting wine festivals and wine tastings; and educational services, namely, conducting seminars and workshops in the field of wine | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Restaurant Services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE
- Other trademarks owned by VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |