USPTO serial 75402855
GLOBAL LEGAL UPDATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2000
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLOBAL LEGAL UPDATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL W. SIXBEY
DANIEL W SIXBEY SIXBEY FRIEDMAN LEEDOM & FERGUSON PC8180 GREENSBORO DR STE 800MCLEAN, VA 22102-3823UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | annual journal directed to articles on commercial law | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |