USPTO serial 75403504
WWW.ENGDYNAMICS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WWW.ENGDYNAMICS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE P KRAMER
LESLIE P KRAMER DORR CARSON SLOAN & BIRNEY PC3010 E 6TH AVEDENVER, CO 80206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ACOUSTICAL TESTING FOR PRODUCT NOISE CONTROL; ACOUSTICAL MATERIALS TESTING, NAMELY, MEASUREMENT OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS AND EVALUATION OF DAMPING MATERIALS; ACOUSTIC FIELD TESTING; TESTING OF EQUIPMENT TO DETERMINE FUNCTIONALITY WHEN EXPOSED TO ACOUSTIC NOISE; TESTING OF EQUIPMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESISTANCE; SEISMIC TESTING AND ANALYSIS; SHOCK TESTING; VIBRATION TESTING; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC, HYDRAULIC, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR DYNAMIC TESTING OF EQUIPMENT AND ASSEMBLIES; DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK TEST FIXTURES; ANALYSIS, TESTING, EVALUATION AND MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT DESIGN FOR INCREASED RELIABILITY, REDUCED PRODUCTION COSTS, OR COMPLYING WITH SPECIFIC NOISE OR VIBRATION REQUIREMENTS; CONSULTATION ABOUT ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION ISSUES; CALIBRATION AND REPAIR OF SOUND LEVEL INSTRUMENTS; PLANNING AND DESIGN TESTING TO DETERMINE ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND TO INTEGRATE SOUND SYSTEMS DESIGN WITH THE ACOUSTICS OF A SPACE DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN OF NOISE AND VIBRATION CONTROL METHODS; BUILDING CERTIFICATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH REGARD TO NOISE AND VIBRATION LEVELS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH NOISE ORDINANCES; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, AND INSTALLING ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS WITH COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR DELIBERATIVE ASSEMBLIES; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING SYSTEMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 11, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |