USPTO serial 75403512
ATHENES 2004
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATHENES 2004?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROSE ANN SULLIVAN
ROSE ANN SULLIVAN UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE1 OLYMPIC PLZCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80909-5760UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | KNAPSACKS; ALL-PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS; BACK PACKS; TOTE BAGS; HANDBAGS; PURSES; WALLETS; CREDIT CARD CASES; LEATHER BUSINESS FOLDERS; BRIEF CASES; ATTACHE CASES OF LEATHER AND VINYL; GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; GYM BAGS; ALL-PURPOSE GEAR CARRYING BAGS; UMBRELLAS; LUGGAGE TRUNKS FOR TRAVELING; PARASOLS; WALKING STICKS; WHIPS; HARNESSES; SADDLERY; BARREL BAGS; FANNY PACKS; DOG LEASHES; TRAVEL BAGS AND SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL; DUFFEL BAGS; SUIT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; SCHOOL BAGS; GYM BAGS SHAPED TO FIT INTO FOOTLOCKERS; PET COLLARS, PET LEADS AND LEATHER IDENTIFICATION TAGS FOR PETS; AND PAPER LUGGAGE TAGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |