USPTO serial 75403608
PRO FORMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO FORMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZACHARY T WOBENSMITH III
6091CARVERSVILLE/WISMER RDP O BOX 370PIPERSVILLE, PA 18947-0370Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SHOES | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |