USPTO serial 75404005
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH E DANISH
KEITH E DANISH TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORSOF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010-7108| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | NON-LUMINOUS, NON-MECHANICAL METAL SIGNS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | DECORATIVE MAGNETS FOR ATTACHING NOTES TO REFRIGERATORS; LUMINOUS SIGNS, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES OF VIRTUAL REALITY COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | STATIONERY, PAPER PRODUCTS, PAPER NAPKINS, PAPER TABLE CLOTHS, PARTY HATS, NOISE MAKERS, PRINTED PAPER SIGNS, PROMOTIONAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL BROCHURES, --HOW TO KITS", RECIPE BOOKS, PAPER AND PRINTED EMBLEMS, PRINTED PAPER SIGNS, PAPER KITCHEN WITCHES, PAPER TOWELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | NON-METAL, NON-LUMINOUS AND NON-MECHANICAL SIGNS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BROOMS, MOPS, POTS, BUCKETS, MIXING BOWELS, MUGS, DISHES, PLATES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | HAND TOWELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, BASEBALL CAPS, APRONS, CHEF'S HATS, HALLOWEEN AND MASQUERADE COSTUMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | EMBROIDERED EMBLEMS, ORNAMENTAL NOVELTY BUTTONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | CARD GAMES, BOARD GAMES, DOLLS, COSTUME MASKS, TOY ACTION WITCH FIGURES, HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |