Drawing for MICRO FOCUS

USPTO serial 75404118

MICRO FOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO FOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 Eighth Steet, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Client-server software for managing multiple-tier computer networks; computer software, namely, software programming tools and utility software for use by software development engineers to provide functionality through the use of utilities for enabling software applications to manage and provide access to data and files over global and local computer networks; software for use over networks, namely, communications software for use in transmitting data and multimedia information over global and local computer networks; software for use over networks, namely, network management software, data delivery software, network utility software, and communications software; computer software, namely, legacy system management programs; computer software for facilitating the transmission and reception of data via a global computer network and other computer networks; computer software for use in software development; computer software for emulating performance characteristics of multiple computer software operating environments; computer software, namely, assemblers, compilers, development environment software, offloading software, source code generators, debugging software, graphic user interface development software tools, file access, transfer and handling software, source code management software, computer code analysis software tools, key and data compression software, software tools for integrating development environments, and operating system extension and runtime software; computer software, namely, programs for maintaining and testing computer software, and instruction manuals supplied as a unit therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 13, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 13, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 13, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 4, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 20, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance