USPTO serial 75404247
AIRPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Material handling equipment; namely, pneumatic or hydraulic lift tables and tilt tables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |