Drawing for CONCEPT

USPTO serial 75404361

CONCEPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCEPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. HARRISON

MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007PRINTING PRESSES FOR THE GRAPHIC TRADE, NAMELY OFFSET PRINTING MACHINESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 28, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 28, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 25, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance