USPTO serial 75404511
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW H SIMPSON
ANDREW H SIMPSON KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RENTAL OF OFFICE MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT; PHOTOCOPYING, REPRODUCING AND COMPILING DOCUMENTS FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENTAL OF OFFICE MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT, PHOTOCOPY, REPRODUCING AND COMPILING DOCUMENTS FOR OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |