USPTO serial 75404666
SCREENLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2531069Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2002
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCREENLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Screenlight Multimedia Studios AG
8125 Zollikerberg, CH
ZOLLIKERBERG, CH
ZOLLIKERBERG, CH
ZOLLIKERBERG, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANJIV D. SARWATE
SANJIV D SARWATE BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Goods made from paper and cardboard, namely, bags for packaging; plastic materials for packaging, namely, envelopes, bags, and wraps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising for others in printed, electronic and digitalized formats; business management and supervision; office work, namely, dataprocessing services, secretarial services, clerical services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing access to a global computer network for others, providing LAN local area network services; providing WAN wide area network services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, conducting training classes and conferences on the subject of business | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Screenlight Multimedia Studios AG
- Other trademarks owned by SEILER, RAPHAEL H.J.
- Other trademarks owned by SEILER, RAPHAEL H.J.
- Other trademarks owned by SEILER, RAPHAEL H.J.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SCREENLIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |