USPTO serial 75404671
SHOE MALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2005
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SHOE MALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
Chippewa Falls, WI
Chippewa Falls, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
Andrew S. Ehard MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized online retail services in the field of clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MASON COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MASON COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Mason Shoe Manufacturing Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Mason Shoe Manufacturing Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SHOE MALL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 7, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 20, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |