Drawing for METROGUIDE

USPTO serial 75404739

METROGUIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METROGUIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DEVON A ROLF

DEVON A ROLF GARMIN INTERNATIONAL INC1200 E 151 ST STOLATHE, KS 66062UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC DATA BASES STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY DVD'S PRERECORDED WITH CARTOGRAPHIC DATA FOR USE BY GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) NAVIGATION RECEIVERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 21, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 19, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 27, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 13, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 27, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance