USPTO serial 75405015
CARELINE PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARELINE PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
51200 Bnei Brak, IL
51200 Bnei Brak, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT SAMUELS GAUTHIER STEVENS & REPPERT225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toiletries, namely, toilet soap, bath salts, bath gel, shower gel, skin cream, skin gel, neck cream, eye cream, hand cream, massage cream, foot cream, facial scrub, facial mask, facial toner, suntan lotion, body cream, body lotion, skin moisturizing cream, fade cream, wrinkle reducing skin preparations, body power, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, and body shampoo | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |