USPTO serial 75405354
SEA PUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEA PUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TECHNO-TRANSFER INDUSTRIES PTE LTD
SG
Other trademarks owned by TECHNO-TRANSFER INDUSTRIES PTE LTD
Racal Survey Services (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
SG
Other trademarks owned by Racal Survey Services (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
TECHNO-TRANSFER INDUSTRIES PTE LTD
SG
Other trademarks owned by TECHNO-TRANSFER INDUSTRIES PTE LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A NEWTON
SCOTT COONAN THALES NORTH AMERICA INCSTE 400675 N WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Observation class, remotely-operated submersible vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNO-TRANSFER INDUSTRIES PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Racal Survey Services (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNO-TRANSFER INDUSTRIES PTE LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SEA PUP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |