USPTO serial 75405992
ASPHALTEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2291663Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 1999
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASPHALTEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID G BOUTELL
DAVID G BOUTELL FLYNN THIEL BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1699UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal edgings for use in delineating the edge of asphalt from other areas | EXPIRED | May 19, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |