Drawing for THE FLOORING GAME

USPTO serial 75406039

THE FLOORING GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FLOORING GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALAN S NEMES

ALAN S NEMES KALISH & GILSTER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYPEPER MARTIN JENSEN MAICHEL AND HETLAGE720 OLIVE ST 24TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101-2396

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing information on types and features of floor coverings by means of a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 24, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance