USPTO serial 75406237
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EMI CHRISTIAN MUSIC GROUP, INC.
BRENTWOOD, TN
SANTA MONICA, CA
CAPITOL CHRISTIAN MUSIC GROUP, INC.
SANTA MONICA, CA
Other trademarks owned by CAPITOL CHRISTIAN MUSIC GROUP, INC.
EMI CHRISTIAN MUSIC GROUP, INC.
BRENTWOOD, TN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sound and video recordings featuring music and religious themes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | printed music, song books, and printed materials namely newsletters, [ teacher's guides, guide books, workbooks and ] resource guides all on the subjects of planning religious services, religion and/or worship | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | arranging and conducting educational conferences and seminars in the field of religion and worship | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | hosting a web site of information for others on the topics of religious music, religious themes, and worship via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |