Drawing for WORKING HANDS CREME

USPTO serial 75406436

WORKING HANDS CREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKING HANDS CREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS W COOK

P O BOX 19893030 BRIDGEWAY, STE 425SAUSALITO, CA 94965

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005medicated skin care preparations, namely, solid, semi-solid or cream preparation for treatment of skin splits and cracks, abrasions and burnsACTIVESep 3, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 29, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 10, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 2, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance