CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TROPHY QUEST

USPTO serial 75406604

TROPHY QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROPHY QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R DARRYL BURKE

R DARRYL BURKE MCKOOL SMITH P.C.300 CRESCENT COURT, SUITE 1500DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio tapes, prerecorded audio cassettes, prerecorded video tapes featuring instructional and demonstrational material and information on general hunting and fishing techniques and fish and gameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 7, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2005ABNDABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB—
Oct 13, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 13, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 13, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 13, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 10, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 13, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance