USPTO serial 75406634
UROTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UROTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FarnhamSurrey GU9 8QL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES H YOUNG
CHARLES H YOUNG HUSCH & EPPENBERGER101 SW ADAMS ST STE 800PEORIA, IL 61602-1335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Catheters; stents; devices, apparatus and instruments for delivering, implanting, handling and removing stents and catheters; urological catheter devices, apparatus, instruments and systems; thermodilution catheters; intravascular oxygenation catheters; drug delivery apparatus, devices, instruments and systems; devices, apparatus and instruments all for use in urology; urinary grafts and stent grafts; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |