USPTO serial 75406730
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADRIENNE L WHITE
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOUSE MARK FOR A FULL LINE OF DATA COMMUNICATION, SATELLITE COMMUNICATION, AND TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, ETC. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING, NAMELY, DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD ADVERTISING, TELEVISION ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, NAMELY, OPERATION OF A BUSINESS FOR OTHERS; OFFICE FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, TELEPHONE ANSWERING AND TYPING SERVICES; BUSINESS CONSULTANCY, BUSINESS INFORMATION, BUSINESS INQUIRIES, BUSINESS INVESTIGATIONS, BUSINESS ORGANIZATION CONSULTANCY; INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION, ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR COMMUNICATIONS TO THE PUBLIC REGARDING ALL KINDS OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | HOUSE MARK FOR A FULL LINE OF DATA COMMUNICATION, SATELLITE COMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, ETC. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |