USPTO serial 75407160
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
73275 Ohmden, DE
73275 Ohmden, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FALIX J D'AMBROSIO
FALIX J D'AMBROSIO P O BOX 2266 EADS STATIONJONES TULLAR & COOPER PCARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | walking sticks, telescoping walking sticks, trekking and hiking sticks and parts thereof, goods made of leather or leather imitations, namely, all purpose sports bags and cases for carrying sports clothing and ruck sacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing namely, sports pants, jackets and shirts, leather pants, jackets and coats, gloves, headwear, ski caps, headbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | sporting equipment, namely, ski poles and parts thereof, kneepads, arm guards for athletic use and faceguards for athletic use, cases for carrying sporting equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |